A proof of the Plancherel theorem
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
• Fourier transform and Plancherel Theorem
When we try to transfer these three concepts to a “curved manifold” M , the situation becomes instantly very complicated. Let us look for an appropriate class of M ’s for which we can expect satisfactory answers. We need the requirement to measure distances, so M should be Riemannian. In order to have a reasonable theory of selfadjoint operators on M we also need completeness. But still the cla...
متن کاملAnother proof of Banaschewski's surjection theorem
We present a new proof of Banaschewski's theorem stating that the completion lift of a uniform surjection is a surjection. The new procedure allows to extend the fact (and, similarly, the related theorem on closed uniform sublocales of complete uniform frames) to quasi-uniformities ("not necessarily symmetric uniformities"). Further, we show how a (regular) Cauchy point on a closed uniform subl...
متن کاملA new proof for the Banach-Zarecki theorem: A light on integrability and continuity
To demonstrate more visibly the close relation between thecontinuity and integrability, a new proof for the Banach-Zareckitheorem is presented on the basis of the Radon-Nikodym theoremwhich emphasizes on measure-type properties of the Lebesgueintegral. The Banach-Zarecki theorem says that a real-valuedfunction $F$ is absolutely continuous on a finite closed intervalif and only if it is continuo...
متن کاملCentral Limit Theorem for Random Partitions under the Plancherel Measure
A partition of a natural number n is any integer sequence λ = (λ1, λ2, . . . ) such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ 0 and λ1 + λ2 + · · · = n (notation: λ ⊢ n). In particular, λ1 = max{λi ∈ λ}. Every partition λ ⊢ n can be represented geometrically by a planar shape called the Young diagram, consisting of n unit cell arranged in consecutive columns, containing λ1, λ2, . . . cells, respectively. On the s...
متن کاملProof of Theorem A
Since the full proof of this theorem 10] is simple yet quite tedious, we connne ourselves to the guidelines of the proof. Observing the angles between the three sample points s i ; s j ; s k forming the minimal angle and the corresponding VD vertex v, we take advantage of the fact that d(v; s i) < d(s i ; s k) (Theorem 4.2(ii)) and, by trigonometric arguments, show that sin sin(120) R M
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences
سال: 1954
ISSN: 0386-2194
DOI: 10.3792/pja/1195526107